Limited internet access these days has been part of what has been slowing down the pace of my blogging. But I'm compelled by the upcoming presidential election (March 4) to share a few thoughts as the day approaches when the country will choose its leader for the next 6 years.
Media reports and anecdotal evidence seem to point to one, inevitable conclusion - Vladimir Putin will be elected president. Putting aside questions about the election's fairness (the government has taken a number of positive steps to secure a more transparent process than in the Duma elections in December), the majority of Russians feel like he Mr. Putin is the best choice. Many are also quite afraid of a revolution; they point to their own history in the 20th century and their neighbors' more recent history to show that revolutions tend to change the people in the leadership, but do little to get rid of authoritarian structures. The graffiti image below illustrates what most people are hoping and expecting from Mr. Putin's leadership. Yet, I thought that it might be appropriate to include here not just the graffiti itself, but the area surrounding it. The picture says a lot about modern Russia: Mr. Putin is in the foreground, while in the background there are signs both of society's economic development and of defensiveness and stagnation.
As regards to my own thoughts, I would say that, given the current situation, I also hope that Mr. Putin wins...but in the second round. In order for any candidate to win outright, they need to gain more than 50% of the vote. I feel like it would be really good for Russian society if the opposition candidates (4 of them) together where able to get more than half of the vote. Three of these candidates are political old-timers who have not been able to reach out and gain many new supporters; the fourth is Mikhail Prokhorov. He is certainly the most interesting candidate in the election, but his business-friendly approach, his enormous wealth, and his lack of political experience hinder him. When faced with a choice between any of those four and Mr. Putin, the country will clearly choose their former leader....but if they have to vote a second time, it will feel like they really had a choice, and that ordinary citizens really can impact political practices. If people gain this confidence, this would be an important step to minimizing the corruption that so seriously affects society.
One piece of evidence that society has already benefited through the protests that have occurred - people are (more frequently, though not always) actually able to exercise the freedom of assembly that is promised to them in the Russian constitution. In years past city governments would go to extremes to be sure that protesters felt threatened and intimidated; in the February protest (pictured below) I saw that the police were few in number and did not bother the protesters at all.
Media reports and anecdotal evidence seem to point to one, inevitable conclusion - Vladimir Putin will be elected president. Putting aside questions about the election's fairness (the government has taken a number of positive steps to secure a more transparent process than in the Duma elections in December), the majority of Russians feel like he Mr. Putin is the best choice. Many are also quite afraid of a revolution; they point to their own history in the 20th century and their neighbors' more recent history to show that revolutions tend to change the people in the leadership, but do little to get rid of authoritarian structures. The graffiti image below illustrates what most people are hoping and expecting from Mr. Putin's leadership. Yet, I thought that it might be appropriate to include here not just the graffiti itself, but the area surrounding it. The picture says a lot about modern Russia: Mr. Putin is in the foreground, while in the background there are signs both of society's economic development and of defensiveness and stagnation.
As regards to my own thoughts, I would say that, given the current situation, I also hope that Mr. Putin wins...but in the second round. In order for any candidate to win outright, they need to gain more than 50% of the vote. I feel like it would be really good for Russian society if the opposition candidates (4 of them) together where able to get more than half of the vote. Three of these candidates are political old-timers who have not been able to reach out and gain many new supporters; the fourth is Mikhail Prokhorov. He is certainly the most interesting candidate in the election, but his business-friendly approach, his enormous wealth, and his lack of political experience hinder him. When faced with a choice between any of those four and Mr. Putin, the country will clearly choose their former leader....but if they have to vote a second time, it will feel like they really had a choice, and that ordinary citizens really can impact political practices. If people gain this confidence, this would be an important step to minimizing the corruption that so seriously affects society.
One piece of evidence that society has already benefited through the protests that have occurred - people are (more frequently, though not always) actually able to exercise the freedom of assembly that is promised to them in the Russian constitution. In years past city governments would go to extremes to be sure that protesters felt threatened and intimidated; in the February protest (pictured below) I saw that the police were few in number and did not bother the protesters at all.
There will be protests, too, after the presidential election. Those who go out in to the streets will be right to want to voice their opinion and to continue to criticize the electoral system. I deeply hope that these concerns are heard and heeded by the government. At the same time, I share the hope of the people of my congregation that the country can avoid a revolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment